Commentaries

PMC Weekly Review - February 12, 2016

A Macro View – 2016, The Year of Negative Rates?

On Wednesday of this week Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen appeared in front of the House Financial Services Committee to share the Fed’s outlook on the economy and monetary policy. With fears of slowing growth and deflation again taking hold throughout many of the world’s developed economies, investors are listening closely to Yellen’s comments for clues on what the Fed’s actions will be going forward. Although it has been broadly expected that the Fed will continue to raise rates throughout 2016, the frequency and magnitude remain anyone’s guess. However, the Fed doesn’t operate in a vacuum, and that expectation has started to lose steam as other central banks have continued their expansionary policies.

The global economy is entering an environment in which major economies are deciding their interest rate policies are not zero-bound, and negative interest rate policies not only are on the table, but also being enacted as countries take increasingly dovish stances to goad their economies onward. In fact, over one fifth of global GDP is governed by a central bank with negative interest rates, according to the Wall Street Journal. Most recently, despite expectations for real GDP growth to exceed 3% in 2015, Sweden’s central bank, the Riksbank, cut its already-negative main interest rate to negative 35 to 50 basis points, and indicated further decreases are on the table. This follows the surprise move in January by the Bank of Japan (BoJ) to implement a negative interest rate on February 16 of minus 10 basis points on commercial bank deposits that are in excess of required minimums. The BoJ stressed this move was in response to volatile global markets, and that the Japanese economy was continuing on a path of moderate recovery. Both Japan and Sweden’s actions follow other countries’ negative interest rate policies, specifically those of Denmark, Switzerland, and the European Central Bank, which adopted a negative 30 basis point deposit rate in December.

The push of advanced economies into sub-zero territory made Yellen’s comments during Wednesday’s hearing much more meaningful to investors searching for clues as to how the Fed will react to the evolving global environment. The Fed voted to raise the Fed Funds Rate in December, for the first time since 2006, to a target range of 25 to 50 basis points, as a positive response to the continued economic recovery. In the Fed’s view, however, that recovery is starting to appear wobbly. Yellen stated on Wednesday, “Financial conditions in the US have recently become less supportive of growth, with declines in broad measures of equity prices, higher borrowing rates for riskier borrowers, and a further appreciation of the dollar.”

Yellen’s statement has led many to speculate on whether the Fed is reconsidering further rate hikes, especially as the negative interest rate policies in other major economies effectively accomplish the Fed’s expected goal of a more hawkish monetary policy. Some may even wonder whether the Fed itself is considering negative interest rates. The Fed recently released the scenarios for stress testing banks in 2016, which incorporate a situation that includes negative yields for short-term Treasury securities. The Fed stated that this was a worst-case scenario, rather than a forecast of future interest rate movements, but it still leaves the door open for investors to question the degree to which the Fed may be rethinking its future moves. In any event, the increasing popularity of negative interest rates raises questions about the Fed’s determination to normalize monetary policy, and will certainly provide fodder for the financial pundits throughout 2016.

Download the full PDF

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2016 Envestnet. All rights reserved.